서브메뉴
검색
Conceptual art
Conceptual art
- 자료유형
- 단행본
- Control Number
- 676995
- International Standard Book Number
- 9780714833880 (pbk.) : $29.95
- International Standard Book Number
- 0714833886 (pbk.)
- Library of Congress Call Number
- N6494.C63-G63 1998
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 709/.04/075-22
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Godfrey, Tony.
- Title Statement
- Conceptual art Tony Godfrey
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- London : Phaidon, 1998
- Physical Description
- 447 p : illustrations (some color), maps ; 22 cm
- Series Statement
- Art & ideas
- General Note
- 김우재 교수 신청 도서
- Bibliography, Etc. Note
- Includes bibliographical references (p. 438-440) and index.
- Formatted Contents Note
- 완전내용:Introduction: What is conceptual art? -- Anti-art gestures in early modernism: Duchamp and Dada -- The postwar period: alternatives to painting -- False, radical and obdurate: realities in the early 1960s -- The dematerialized object, almost: eight conceptual artworks -- Who were the brain police?: varieties of conceptual art -- The crisis of authority: political and institutional contexts -- The end?: decline or diaspora of conceptual art? -- Where were they?: the curious case of women conceptual artists -- Looking at others: artists using photography -- What is your name?: artists using words since 1980 -- Who are the style police?: controversies and contexts in recent art.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- 김우재
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Conceptual art
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Art, Modern 20th century
- Series Added Entry-Uniform Title
- Art & ideas.
- Control Number
- sacl:118762
- 책소개
-
This text covers the entire twentieth century, tracing the roots of Conceptual Art to movements such as Dada, explaining its importance in the 1960s and 1970s and showing that it is very much alive today.
Covering the entire 20th century, this text traces the roots of conceptualrt to movements such as Dada, explaining its importance in the 1960s and970s and showing that it is still alive today.;In 1917 Marcel Duchamp signedhe name R. Mutt on a urinal and placed it in a gallery. Even the mosttrident modernists refused to accept this object as a work of art, however,uchamp stuck to his guns, claiming that he had chosen the urinal as an artbject so it must be art. Such arguments over the nature of art stillontinue today. Tony Godfrey sees the archetypal work of Conceptual Art as auestion and a proposition joined together: "What is Art? This could be Art."his text seeks to demystify the subject by placing the art in its social andolitical context.